FEATURES : COLUMNS : REVIEWS : NEWS : FILM & TV : FORUMS : UGO

ABOUT




New Doc Ock Hits Spider-Man
Have you seen the new Doctor Octopus, designed by fan-favorite artist Humberto Ramos? Click to dig the Doc.
Marvel Hires New Publisher
Following such rumors, Marvel today announced that Bill Jemas has been replaced as Publisher. Now read who took his job.
CrossGen's Solus #7
CrossGen thinks you'll love George Pérez's new issue of Solus. And to prove it, here's a five-page preview.
Marvel Searches For She-Hulk
Writer Geoff Johns and artist Scott Kolins reunite for Marvel's Avengers as they search for She-Hulk.
Virtex Returns For Digital Webbing
A comic about a cybernetic cowboy that hunts outlaws riding dinosaurs? Where do we sign up? Read on and find out.
Marvel's Mutants Gains New Penciler
Marvel's New Mutants has a new artist onboard, and we've got a five-page preview. See if he's got the chops.
Image Rocks Out With Shangri-La
Are you ready to rock and roll? Image is, with their upcoming graphic novel Shangri-La. Read the details here.
Marvel Teams Up For A Good Cause
Spider-Man and The Incredible Hulk team up for charity in a special December one-shot. Read all about it.
Davis' Marquis Returns In December
Guy Davis' sin-slayer is back in The Marquis: Intermezzo, coming from Oni Press. Read all about it.
Marvel Unveils '04 FF Plans
Marvel plans three Fantastic Four series for 2004, and we've got the details and preview art. Check this out.
2F2F DVD Contest
The hit street racing film 2 Fast 2 Furious is driving to DVD players near you. Win a free copy from Slush and Universal.
 








IMO:
Archeology 101
By John Byrne

04/28/02


(NOTE: What follows is an expanded version of a comment I posted to the message board of the "Unofficial John Byrne Fan Site")


A while back I learned that there were plans afoot to revisit the story "A Small Loss," from my run on Fantastic Four. The intent, apparently, is to establish that Sue's and Reed's second child had not died as a miscarriage after all.

Now, contrary to what you might expect, my first reaction upon learning this was not "How dare they mess with my masterpiece!" I gave up a long, long time ago on any ghost of a hope that a story of mine would remain forever inviolate. (Around the time Bill Mantlo did an ill-conceived "sequel" to "Terror in a Tiny Town," for his Micronauts book.)

Nope, my immediate reaction was something more closely akin to "But that story is nearly 20 years old!!" Why on earth revisit a tale that was published before most or the readers were even born? Especially one that, to the best of my knowledge, has not been reprinted, and is not likely to be in the foreseeable future?

Julie Schwartz refers to a certain breed of writers (a group which would include me) as "The Archeologists." These are the ones who dig into the back issues in search of story ideas. There are some writers -- even some very good writers -- who have reached a point where they seem incapable of even making a start without dredging up something from the past that they feel needs "fixing." Sometimes they find good stuff. Sometimes they find dross. But mostly what they find is **old stuff**.

Is that necessarily a bad thing?

Well, yes and no (of course!). In the past several years I have seen my career turn more and more toward exploration of Things Past. Generations 1 and 2. Marvel: The Lost Generation (with Roger Stern). Spider-Man: Chapter One. X-Men: The Hidden Years. All were well received, sold well (at least for the current marketplace), and in some cases were even highly praised. Am I now saying I think maybe I shouldn't have done these series?

Not quite. Read on.

You know those "new readers" we talk about all the time? That Holy Grail the industry is supposed to be seeking? What does a story built on an issue from 20 years ago mean to them? Or 10 years ago? Or 50? Or even 5? Captain America's shield is destroyed because it was "flawed" since Secret Wars II. How long ago was that? Superman discovers the Silver Age Krypton is "real." How long since it wasn't?

There are lots of ways to build new and interesting stories *set* in the past. That's where books like Lost Generation, XHY, and G1 and G2 fit in. You can read any one of them without ever having seen those characters before. In fact, in the case of LG the whole point was what you had not seen those characters before. None of them hung on the reader knowing past history. There were references, to be sure, for readers who did know the backstory, but the books did not hinge on those moments.

There are even occasions when it is deemed necessary to revisit the past in order to dust it off a bit, to bring things up to date, a la Chapter One, or the earlier Man of Steel, rather than letting increasingly hoary old tales drag out behind us like the chains on Marley's Ghost. These, of course, use the past more or less as a new starting point, rather than as a foundation on which to layer more, retroactive material.

Me, I'd love to see more stories set in past epochs, in fact. More (as if there are many anyway!) Westerns, more World Wars I and II stories. More stories from the Cold War. From the Victorian Age. Heck -- all over the temporal map. Why not? There is a treasure trove of material to be mined there. (This despite the protests of some fans who say they don't read or like "stuff set in the past." My most humorous encounter in that arena was with a slightly beligerent fan who insisted, at MidOhioCon, that he had no intention of reading Hidden Years, for precisely this reason. The fact that he was wearing a Star Wars T-shirt held an irony which seemed utterly lost on him.)

But I wonder how good an idea it is for us to keep dredging up the past as the basis for modern stories? How good an idea is it to produce those footnote heavy tales that require a reader to either already know a lot about the history of the characters, or to be prepared to do a lot of extra reading. (I have been guilty of this sin myself, to be sure. "VisionQuest," in West Coast Avengers, was such a tale, though I flatter myself that I made it largely accessible to a new reader.)

But 99% of the stories I read as a young fan existed in complete isolation from the stories around them, and seemed none the worse for it. (The first story I remember that required the reader to be familiar with a specific previous story appeared in FF 32 -- and actually led to my "quitting" comics! My parents had been badgering me to stop reading those kiddie books, and when I was able to guess the identity of the "surprise villain" by page 4, entirely because I had read his previous appearance, I got to thinking maybe they were right, and maybe I had passed a significant signpost on the road to becoming a Grown Up.¹) Sadly, it often seems now that the very thing which made the neophyte Marvel Comics so intriguing, the very thing which worked so much to their advantage as they sallied forth against the slumbering, stumbling giant over at National Periodicals -- well, that very sense of everything being interwoven now works against the enlistment of new readers.

When I look at what seems a majority of comics being produced these days, I am struck by how many depend on at least some awareness of previously published material, whether the comic to hand represents an expansion of that material, or whether it exists solely to tear down that material (another problem altogether), the reader really needs to know what the material in question is. Marvel, especially, has been taken to task for this, and by no means just recently. The greatest complaint against books like X-MEN is that they are so hard for a new reader to penetrate, enmeshed and entangled as they are in their own complex lore. (Remember those foldout "Story So Far" covers of a few years past. Surely needing a dozen column inches to catch up a new reader is an indication that something has gone sorely amiss!)

Maybe -- maybe -- it's time we devoted more energy to looking forward, and whole lot less to looking back?



________________

¹ Luckily, I was able to get off that road altogether before it was too late!


Article continued below advertisement


 

 
E-Mail Author  |  Archive  |  Tell A Friend

 

 



 
Sword of Dracula
Slush launches our Halloween countdown with the first in a series of spooky reviews. First up? New series, Sword of Dracula.
John Byrne's IMO
This week John points out that fans cannot read the minds of creators, although you wouldn't know that by listening to some of them.
The Dead Zone
Flesh-eating zombies battle the last remaining police officer in Image's new series, The Walking Dead. We review the first issue.
Steve Niles Interview
Slush interviews Steve Niles, the acclaimed writer of 30 Days of Night, who tells us about the relaunch of Fused.
A Spidery Preview
Have you seen the new Doctor Octopus, designed by fan-favorite artist Humberto Ramos? Click to dig the Doc.
Kill Bill Review
Slush reviews the first installment of Quentin Tarantino's kung fu slasher masterpiece, Kill Bill.
Viper Interview
Slush takes a look at new publisher Viper Comics, and interviews the guys behind two of its hottest books.
Peanuts Collected
Cartoon fans rejoice. Fantagraphics is reprinting the entire collection of Charles Schulz' Peanuts. Read on for details.


CHANNELS:  Features | Columns | Reviews | News | Film & TV | Forums | Slushfactory.com

Copyright © 2003 Slush Factory Entertainment (E-mail)
All Rights Reserved : No portion of Slush may be reprinted in any form without prior consent